TMR’s Hockey East Stat Pack #5

Statistics. Some people love them, some people hate them. If you’re in the latter, look away right now.

If you like statistics, particularly ones that you can’t find in the everyday box score, this weekly post is going to be right up your alley. Click here to find our previous stat packages throughout the season. At the bottom, see some Merrimack-specific numbers.

Adjusted Possession Percentage

Percentage of total shots taken in all games, minus power-play shots
[table]Rank, Team, AdjPoss%
1., Boston University, 55.90%
2., New Hampshire, 55.54%
3., Vermont, 54.77%
4., Boston College, 53.31%
5., Merrimack, 52.62%
6., Mass.-Lowell, 49.86%
7., Northeastern, 49.56%
8., Notre Dame, 48.63%
9., Maine, 47.61%
9., Providence, 47.61%
11., Massachusetts, 44.07%
12., Connecticut, 43.93%
[/table]

PDO

Sum of even-strength save percentage and even-strength shooting percentage. Over time, should equal 1.000. Attempts to show which teams are getting “puck luck.” A higher PDO suggests a team will not be able to keep that pace, and over time will regress.
[table]Rank, Team, PDO
1., Mass.-Lowell, 1.039
2., Vermont, 1.032
3., Providence, 1.028
4., Boston University, 1.024
5., Merrimack, 1.014
6., Notre Dame, 1.010
7., Connecticut, .990
8., Massachusetts, .981
9., Maine, .972
10., New Hampshire, .971
11., Northeastern, .966
12., Boston College, .965
[/table]

Even Strength Performance

Note: Save percentage and shooting percentage includes shots taken shorthanded. EN and PP situations are excluded.
[table]Rank, Team, Diff, 5x5GF, 5x5GA, Sv%, Sh%
1., Vermont, +1.20, 2.60, 1.40, .931, 10.13%
2., Boston University, +1.15, 2.31, 1.15, .950, 7.42%
3., Mass.-Lowell, +0.67, 2.60, 1.93, .921, 11.78%
4., Providence, +0.64, 1.57, 0.93, .959, 6.99%
5., Merrimack, +0.47, 1.73, 1.27, .938, 7.62%
6., Notre Dame, +0.13, 2.19, 2.06, .918, 9.21%
7., New Hampshire, -0.17, 1.83, 2.00, .901, 7.04%
8., Boston College, -0.36, 2.36, 2.71, .851, 11.41%
9., Connecticut, -0.47, 1.27, 1.73, .926, 6.40%
10., Northeastern, -0.71, 1.14, 1.86, .919, 4.72%
11., Maine, -1.00, 1.47, 2.47, .906, 6.61%
12., Massachusetts, -1.15, 2.00, 3.15, .878, 10.33%
[/table]

Power Play

[table]
Rank, Team, Min/G on PP, Min/SOG on PP, PP Sh%
1., Mass.-Lowell, 6:04, 1:44, 28.57%
2., Vermont, 7:18, 1:07, 15.38%
3., Boston University, 7:24, 1:07, 15.00%
4., Merrimack, 9:21, 1:05, 11.67%
5., Northeastern, 11:08, 1:21, 12.16%
6., Massachusetts, 12:52, 1:35, 12.28%
7., Connecticut, 15:40, 1:10, 7.41%
8., Boston College, 16:58, 1:16, 7.50%
9., New Hampshire, 17:36, 1:18, 7.41%
10., Maine, 19:19, 1:44, 8.96%
11., Providence, 19:31, 1:24, 7.14%
12., Notre Dame, 27:10, 1:49, 6.67%
[/table]

Penalty Kill

[table]
Rank, Team, Min/GA on PK, Min/SOGA on PK, PK Sv%
1., Vermont, 31:59, 1:25, .956
2., Boston College, 16:55, 1:07, .934
3., Merrimack, 14:35, 1:29, .899
4., New Hampshire, 14:10, 1:49, .872
5., Boston University, 13:05., 1:05, .917
6., Connecticut, 12:02, 1>01, .916
7., Maine, 10:09, 1:18, .872
8., Providence, 9:23, 1:22, .855
9., Notre Dame, 9:12, 1:07, .879
10., Mass.-Lowell, 7:04, 1:18, .817
11., Massachusetts, 6:47, 1:20, .803
12., Northeastern, 5:43, 1:04, .813
[/table]

Overall Special Teams

PP shooting percentage added to PK save percentage
[table]
Rank, Team, PDO
1., Vermont, 1.110
2., Mass.-Lowell, 1.102
3., Boston University, 1.067
4., Merrimack, 1.015
5., Boston College, 1.009
6., Connecticut, .990
7., Maine, .962
8., New Hampshire, .946
8., Notre Dame, .946
10., Northeastern, .934
11., Providence, .927
12., Massachusetts, .926
[/table]

Team Faceoff Performance

[table]Rank, Team, FOW, FOL, FO%
1., Providence, 433, 400, 52.0%
2., Northeastern, 447, 424, 51.3%
3., Merrimack, 496, 475, 51.1%
4., Mass.-Lowell, 485, 473, 50.6%
5., Maine, 454, 447, 50.4%
6., Massachusetts, 427, 431, 49.8%
7., Notre Dame, 481, 490, 49.5%
8., Connecticut, 459, 471, 49.4%
9., Vermont, 447, 462, 49.2%
10., Boston College, 470, 489, 49.0%
11., New Hampshire, 345, 369, 48.3%
12., Boston University, 346, 419, 45.2%
[/table]

Top Faceoff Performers

Min. 100 faceoffs
[table]Rank, Player, Team, FOW, FOL, FO%
1., Hampus Gustafsson, Merrimack, 156, 106, 59.5%
2., Mark Jankowski, Providence, 96, 67, 58.9%
3., Chris Maniccia, Mass.-Lowell, 102, 77, 57.0%
4., Ross Mauermann, Providence, 111, 84, 56.9%
5., Connor Hurley, Notre Dame, 94, 79, 54.3%
[/table]

Merrimack Specific

[table]
Category, Total, Home, Away
Goals For, 2.73, 2.50, 2.60
Goals Against, 1.80, 1.13, 3.00
Differential, +0.93, +1.38, -0.40
/
Shots For, 30.87, 28.75, 32.00
Shots Against, 25.00, 24.50, 26.20
Differential, +5.87, +4.25, +5.80
/
Shot Attempts For, 54.40, 52.50, 53.40
Shot Attempts Against, 47.87, 48.88, 45.80
Differential, +6.53, +3.63, +7.60
/
Corsi For%, 53.19%, 51.79%, 53.83%
Shooting%, 8.86%, 8.70%, 8.13%
Save%, .928, .954, .885
/
Attempts On Goal, 56.74%, 54.76%, 59.93%
Attempts On Goal Against, 52.23%, 50.13%, 57.21%
/
Opp Shot Attempts blocked by MC, 25.63%, 24.55%, 24.89%
MC Shot Attempts blocked by Opp, 21.32%, 21.90%, 21.72%
[/table]

Mike McMahon covers Merrimack College for The Eagle Tribune and is the founder and managing editor of The Mack Report as well as on staff as a senior writer at College Hockey News. Follow him on Twitter @MikeMcMahonCHN

About Mike McMahon 6221 Articles
Mike McMahon is in his 13th year covering Merrimack College for The Eagle Tribune and is the founder and managing editor of The Mack Report. Mike also serves on staff as a senior writer at College Hockey News. Follow him on Twitter @MikeMcMahonCHN

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Preview: Notre Dame Visits Amherst For Final Hockey East Games of 2014 | Fear The Triangle - UMass Hockey Blog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.